Monkey dem work, baboons dem chop.

Dr Liu talks some sense but is still constrained by the notion of exchange value, desiring to put a value on nature in order to stave off environmental disaster, but only as a means of saving the political economy.

Whilst Dr Liu pontificates, the proletariat in China rebuilds Eden, heaven on earth.

https://youtu.be/IDgDWbQtlKI

GENDER AFTER CIVILIZATION: Queer Lives in the Aftermath is now seeking submissions.
GENDER AFTER CIVILIZATION: Queer Lives in the Aftermath is a journal of queer anarchist theory and art from anti-civ, post-civ, green, anti-colonial, and indigenous thinkers. First and foremost, we reject the notion that the negation of civilization will necessarily exclude trans* struggles, from both sides of the argument: objectionable TERFs such as Derrick Jensen, and aptly-named truscum who deny the lived experiences of indigenous trans* folk pre-colonization. We believe industrial civilization actively works to degrade and assimilate queer lives. This much is apparent. The question becomes: what lies past the veil of insurrection against Leviathan? What will our queer lives be like in the aftermath?
This call is purposefully brief: this journal is intended as a space to explore the possibilities that total liberation will bring. Against all cages!
SEND ALL SUBMISSIONS TO feralliberation@autistici.org
DEADLINE MAY 1, 2019

What we are claiming right now are not civil rights, they are uncivil rights.
We demand the right to move freely without being bothered by a machine or a fence.
Not a return to an imaginary age of barbarism: there is no more barbaric age than this, the Era of Junk.
We demand the simplification of the production process according to human needs and in harmony with nature.
We refuse all forms of labour and embrace any form of human activity.

We need to focus on tasks ahead of us. We also need to think about a war that they are running while maintaining this sickening society. We need to be prepared.
     The internet has served them well. They are now giving themselves a permission slip to use the "red list".
A few things going on: HB 687 "Red Flag Gun Law" 
                                 The feds "parallel construction" tactic.
                                 "Practical Terrorism Prevention"

      It appears that they will be (and have been) breaking rules they made for themselves (constitution).
The surveillance capabilities will probably be put into use more now. Parallel construction is a tactic that basically means any one of us could be detained at gunpoint AT ANY TIME NOW. A good description of this tactic is here: 
                          https://www.wired.com/story/stingray-sec...-programs/
The feds use the net (amongst other techniques) They tell the local pigs to nab you.The local pigs come up with a "parallel" (BS story).

       HB 687 is legislation being looked at that allows police to remove guns from people declared to be a threat. Here's the kicker: According to the bill "the accuser can be kept anonymous". After you understand how parallel construction tactics work, you will understand the danger of the legislation below. Regardless of the bill, we are in danger.
                        Read:    https://www.nhfc-ontarget.org/wp-content...cation.pdf

           Why not throw in a couple more links to show where we're at now. It's important to understand how close to the edge we are now. I think reading these and understanding the threat is important. This is a war that,so far, is being "fought" just the way they want it to. We need to get our shit together.
                                     https://www.activistpost.com/2019/02/ran...unity.html

                                      https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2647.html
Hoot

 For anyone interested,and more will be interested, this is a lengthy explanation. It is ONLY A THEORY. And a theory that can not be easily tested like a scientific hypothesis. I'll sum it up.

1)There’s a “recipe” if you will, that I, and possibly a few others hold, that forms the theory that autism is intentionally man-made to counter rebellion and possibly other traits that would be harmful to the controllers agenda. Support to this theory follows in key links. These links provide subtle clues that go along with my other findings. My attempts to send this through other channels has been blocked. I would appreciate help in forwarding this article around the net. This should be circulated.

2) How evil are the controllers ? How important is it to them to hold onto their game ? What measures will they take ?

3) How do we test the hypothesis that autism is man made, with a twisted scheme to counter rebellion in genetics ?

4)Science is usually much further ahead then we think it is. What were the Nazi’s doing back in the 1940’s?  What did American scientists learn from them ?

My theory is that (possibly Nazi) scientists found a chemical reaction that would counter rebellion in genetics in a way that damages the brain. It could be administered through the MMR vaccine,or possibly other means, and prove HARMLESS to those without the possibility for developing a high standard of rebellion. This “reaction” would be harmless to all other DNA, EXCEPT those with rebellion traits. And quite possibly other traits harmful to the controllers agenda,such as high intellect. The agent causing this reaction could be RANDOMLY “installed” into the MMR and other means to further decrease the chance of any links being found. The agent causes irreversible brain damage (Autism) to recipients that posses high amounts of the "rebel" or "smart" gene.

5) Rebellion in genetics. Too much of this would be bad for the controllers.

SUPPORT:  https://www.ageofautism.com/2016/04/lets...utism.html

                    http://www.paultarver.com/the-rebel-gene/

                     https://www.medicalbag.com/despicable-do...le/472824/

                    https://dna-explained.com/2013/06/16/the-warrior-gene/

                    
                     https://geneticliteracyproject.org/2016/...tism-gene/

                    https://www.history.com/news/what-was-op...-paperclip

                    https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-new...180961110/

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/...utism.html

                   
            [Image: https://www.autismspeaks.org/sites/defau...c_hero.jpg]
                   

An interview on Canadian public television with David Buss and David Sloan Wilson on the mismatch between modern civilization and the way humans evolved, causing all kinds of health and social problems.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dYT6R-7WZMQ

(Unfortunately they can't bring themselves to the obvious conclusion)

By Andy Beckett for The Guardian

Work is the master of the modern world. For most people, it is impossible to imagine society without it. It dominates and pervades everyday life – especially in Britain and the US – more completely than at any time in recent history. An obsession with employability runs through education. Even severely disabled welfare claimants are required to be work-seekers. Corporate superstars show off their epic work schedules. “Hard-working families” are idealised by politicians. Friends pitch each other business ideas. Tech companies persuade their employees that round-the-clock work is play. Gig economy companies claim that round-the-clock work is freedom. Workers commute further, strike less, retire later. Digital technology lets work invade leisure.

In all these mutually reinforcing ways, work increasingly forms our routines and psyches, and squeezes out other influences. As Joanna Biggs put it in her quietly disturbing 2015 book All Day Long: A Portrait of Britain at Work, “Work is … how we give our lives meaning when religion, party politics and community fall away.”

And yet work is not working, for ever more people, in ever more ways. We resist acknowledging these as more than isolated problems – such is work’s centrality to our belief systems – but the evidence of its failures is all around us.

More:

https://getpocket.com/explore/item/post-...thout-jobs

Hello all,

I'm AX, currently based in "Australia". I decided to use this forum in order to make contact with others that are interested in anti-civ ideas and potentially even working on projects together offline. At the end of the day I'm here for discussion, to meet like minded people and learn.

Feel free to message me.

"We need to revamp the view of Neanderthals as these meat-eating, club-toting cavemen,” adds Weyrich. “They had a very good understanding of what foods were available to them".

Weyrich’s results matches all of these earlier ones, and portrays Neanderthals as adaptable and versatile. “Those that occupied southern regions with relatively warm climates, consumed different types of foods, including meat and vegetables,” says Luca Fiorenza from Monash University, who was not involved in the study. “But Neanderthals that lived in very harsh conditions, such as northern Europe, were forced to rely on the limited sources available—meat.”

The mouth microbiomes of the various Neanderthals were as different as their diets. Those form the largely vegetarian individuals from El Sidron were closer to the microbial communities in chimps and Stone Age human gatherers. Those of the Spy Neanderthal clustered with other humans who eat more meat, including European hunter-gatherers and African cattle-farmers. These results suggest that you can use the microbes preserved within fossilized plaque to work out what their long-dead owners may have eaten.

More:

https://www.theatlantic.com/science/arch...ke/518949/

https://ats.org/news/governor-cuomo-laun...to-israel/